Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa has said that asking for postponement by Tehreek-e-Insaf is a delaying tactic.
In the Supreme Court, a 3-member bench headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa heard the review petition filed against the decision of the Tehreek-e-Insaf intra-party elections.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musrat Hilali were part of the 3-member bench.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that the case was scheduled for a hearing on the proposed cause list on May 29. Advocate Ali Zafar had requested a general adjournment till June 4. A member of the bench underwent open heart surgery.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan said that Dholchi made the intra-party election case a bat mark case, Dholchi should first read the court decision and then criticize it. To date, I have not seen any application in which adjournment has been sought due to family engagement.
He said that an adjournment is definitely sought due to death or ill health, they will not grant a further adjournment in the case, and asking for an adjournment on behalf of Tehreek-e-Insaf is a delaying tactic.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that the case is adjourned but the truth should be told.
Justice Musarat Hilali said that all the lawyers of Tehreek-e-Insaf did not come, no assistant appeared, this method is not correct, and there should not be such an attitude in the Supreme Court, I do not agree with the adjournment of the case.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that he is adjourning the case according to the requirements of justice, he is not adjourning the case on the request for adjournment, he will not adjourn the case for the sake of Hamid Khan, even in the morning we rejected the adjournment requests. are
Later, the Supreme Court adjourned the hearing of the review petition filed against the intra-party election decision till October 21 and Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa ordered the hearing today.
According to the decree, a request to adjourn the hearing was filed before the Supreme Court. In the request for adjournment, the family engagements of Hamid Khan were mentioned. Are there family engagements? Not told by Hamid Khan.
According to the order, a review was sought against the January 13 decision, if there were family engagements, the services of other lawyers could have been engaged.
The order reads that counsel can be changed in revision under Section 6 of the Practice and Procedure Act, the application for adjournment is rejected, adjournment is granted given the exigencies of justice, the hearing will be held on October 21, any further adjournment. will not be given.
